Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1995 1995 (2) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 361 to 364 of 364 Records
-
1995 (2) TMI 4
Capital Expenditure, Commencement Of Business, Fluctuation In Rate, Foreign Exchange, Revenue Expenditure
-
1995 (2) TMI 3
Concessional Rate, Industrial Company ... ... ... ... ..... 1993 204 ITR 412, yet it would not have any bearing on the facts of this case. There the finding was that the assessee-company was a firm of contractors constituted for the purpose of construction of a dam in Orissa. The contention there was that the activity of constructing a dam was an industrial activity and the company was an industrial undertaking for the purpose of section 80HH. The Orissa High Court had taken the view that it was an industrial undertaking and that was reversed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, that decision does not directly apply to the facts of the present case where there is a finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal that the assessee-company was carrying on manufacturing activities. In this view of the matter, we need not go into the other decisions cited by learned counsel for the Revenue. The question referred by us is answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The referred case is accordingly answered.
-
1995 (2) TMI 2
Development Allowance, Sales Promotion, Weighted Deduction ... ... ... ... ..... a. This would certainly be the amount of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the promotion of sales outside India, on maintenance of agency outside India. Under the said sub-clause, it is not necessary that the assessee would get the benefit of weighted deduction only if a branch or office is maintained outside India. But that benefit the assessee would get, even if the work of promotion of sale is done through agency. Similar view is taken by-- (1) The Calcutta High Court, in the case of CIT v. Chloride India Ltd. 1992 193 ITR 355 (2) The Kerala High Court in the case of CIT v. Pooppally Foods 1986 161 ITR 729 and (3) The Kerala High Court in the case of Srivilas Cashew Co. v. CIT 1992 196 ITR 887. Considering the aforesaid discussion and the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decisions, the question raised in the present reference is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
-
1995 (2) TMI 1
Concealment of stock - petitioners are liable to pay the tax ... ... ... ... ..... the tax of Rs. 3,54,864 on the basis of the concealed stock of the value of Rs. 4,93,177 which was the value of the stock as estimated earlier under his order of March 28, 1985. We, therefore, find no substance in this petition. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.
....
|
|