Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise 2008 2008 2008 (7) Central Excise - 2008 (7) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Central Excise - Case Laws
Showing 321 to 326 of 326 Records
-
2008 (7) TMI 25
Adverse entry against appellant, Dt. Commissioner of Central Ex. & Customs – representation against that adverse entry rejected by both Chief Commissioner & Central Govt.– plea of petitioner is that Chief Commissioner & Central Govt. are bias – held that Chief Commissioner and the Central Government are very high authorities and they have considered the representations of the appellant, so there is no bias - plea was not taken before Tribunal or HC so cannot be taken for the first time before us
-
2008 (7) TMI 21
Waiver of the pre-deposit of the duty/penalty - petitioner’s appeals in the first & second rounds have succeeded and in the three successive adjudication orders the aggregate duty / penalty amount has dropped radically from 5 crores to 1.41 crores - held that the petitioner’s appeal before the tribunal ought to be heard on the basis of the deposit of Rs. 1.50 lacs already made by the petitioner - petitioner is undergoing genuine financial hardship - now it is reduced from 1.41 crore to 64 lacs
-
2008 (7) TMI 16
SC dismissed the appeal after condoning the delay - earlier CESTAT (2007 (7) TMI 152 - CESTAT, KOLKATA) held that Inputs integrally connected with manufacture of final product are only eligible for credit - Credit cannot be denied mere on procedural mistake - However credit denied on non-compliance with rules is justified - Heavy penalty not justified
-
2008 (7) TMI 12
Liquid hair dyes – classification - there was no specific entry relating to "hair dyes" under CET however, "hair lotion" is specified under Tariff Item 14F - Demand under Tariff Item 14F of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 – said product could not be treated as a lotion to be used as a scalp or hair nourisher or for medicinal purposes - appellant's preparation was poisonous and had to be used with great care – demand according to Tariff Item 14F was erroneous
-
2008 (7) TMI 4
Exemption to 100% EOU – Sale of goods to DTA manufactured wholly from the raw materials produced or manufactured in India – Original authority denied the exemption since the goods were manufactured from the indigenous inputs – Tribunal allowed the exemption under notification no. 8/97 – SC has remanded the matter to tribunal for de-novo consideration, whether “consumable” falls within the broader scope of the words “raw materials?”
-
2008 (7) TMI 1
Credit on channel, angles, joints, squares, equal angles of iron & steel used for installation of batch vessel – goods once brought in factory for use in the principal plant & machinery, which are directly used in mfg. of excisable articles, are the capital goods - Tribunal has rightly come to the conclusion that aforesaid items used for installation of batch vessel form an essential part of the plant and machinery, therefore, credit is not deniable – no substantial question of law is involved
....
|
|