Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise 2009 2009 2009 (10) Central Excise - 2009 (10) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Central Excise - Case Laws

Showing 181 to 182 of 182 Records

• 2009 (10) TMI 11
  

  Refund of duty deposited under protest – period of limitation – held that - Whether the duty was in fact deposited under protest is a question of fact or not, it appears that this matter was not seriously contested before the Excise Authorities. We may make it clear that if the duty was not deposited under protest then the limitation for seeking refund is six months only. However, it is deposited under protest, there is no limitation to claim refund – matter remitted back to decided the question as to whether the duty was in fact deposited under protest or not

  ---

• 2009 (10) TMI 1
  

  Prosecution – evasion of central excise – sentence of imprisonment for a period of 6 months – relaxation – Held that - appellants are above 70 years' in age and the entire duty allegedly evaded by the present appellants has already been paid by them. Under the above circumstances and in view of the special reasons, we confirm the conviction but modify the sentence and direct that the appellants 2 and 3 shall pay a sum of Rs.2 lacs each in lieu of six months imprisonment within six weeks before the Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai and produce a receipt before the authority before whom the appellants had executed bail bonds and on production of such receipt, their bail bonds will stand cancelled

  ---

1 ....678910