Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI YAGAY andSUN Experts This

The Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

The Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016
YAGAY andSUN By: YAGAY andSUN
May 7, 2025
All Articles by: YAGAY andSUN       View Profile
  • Contents

The Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016 were introduced under Section 442 of the Companies Act, 2013, to provide an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism for resolving corporate disputes. The rules aim to encourage the use of mediation and conciliation as a means of settling disputes between companies and their stakeholders, including shareholders, creditors, and other parties, without resorting to prolonged litigation.

These rules align with the broader objective of ensuring the timely resolution of disputes, reducing the burden on the courts, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of the corporate legal framework in India.

Key Provisions of the Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016

1. Applicability of Mediation and Conciliation

  • The Mediation and Conciliation Rules apply to disputes related to the Companies Act, 2013. These may include disputes between:
    • Shareholders and members of a company.
    • Creditors and debtors.
    • Directors and the company.
  • The objective is to resolve conflicts through mediation and conciliation, which are processes where a neutral third party (mediator or conciliator) facilitates the discussion between the disputing parties to help them reach an agreement.

2. Mediation and Conciliation Process

2.1. Initiation of Mediation and Conciliation

  • The process can be initiated by either:
    • A court or tribunal referring a dispute to mediation or conciliation.
    • The parties to the dispute can mutually agree to refer the matter to mediation or conciliation.
  • A Mediator or Conciliator is appointed to oversee the process. The parties involved must consent to mediation or conciliation, and the process is voluntary.

2.2. Appointment of Mediators and Conciliators

  • Mediators and Conciliators are appointed from a panel maintained by the Institute of Corporate Affairs (ICA) or other authorized bodies.
  • The appointed mediator or conciliator must be:
    • Experienced and qualified to handle corporate disputes.
    • Neutral and must disclose any conflict of interest before being appointed.
  • Mediators/Conciliators must also have a professional background in resolving corporate disputes and should have the trust of both parties.

2.3. Role of the Mediator/Conciliator

  • The mediator/conciliator’s role is to facilitate discussions between the parties and help them come to a mutually acceptable solution. This may include:
    • Understanding the issues at hand.
    • Identifying common ground.
    • Proposing settlement terms.
  • The mediator/conciliator does not have the authority to make decisions or impose solutions. The process remains confidential and non-binding unless the parties reach a written agreement.

3. Timeframe for Resolution

  • Mediation and conciliation processes are designed to be quick and efficient.
  • The rules specify a 60-day period from the appointment of the mediator/conciliator for resolving the dispute. This period may be extended if both parties agree.
  • In the event of an agreement, a settlement agreement is prepared and signed by both parties and the mediator.
  • If the dispute is not resolved within the stipulated time, the mediator must submit a report stating that the matter could not be resolved.

4. Confidentiality of Mediation and Conciliation

  • The rules emphasize confidentiality during the mediation and conciliation process. Any information shared by the parties in the course of the mediation is privileged and cannot be disclosed unless both parties agree.
  • The mediator/conciliator must maintain confidentiality and must not use any information obtained during the process for any other purpose.

5. Settlement Agreement

  • If a settlement is reached during mediation or conciliation, a settlement agreement is drawn up, outlining the terms of the resolution.
  • The agreement must be signed by:
    • The disputing parties.
    • The mediator or conciliator.
  • Once signed, the agreement is treated as binding, and the parties are expected to abide by it.
  • The settlement agreement is also submitted to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for approval. If NCLT approves the settlement, it is made a part of the official record.

6. Failure of Mediation and Conciliation

  • If the mediation or conciliation does not result in a settlement, the mediator will file a report with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) stating that the matter could not be resolved.
  • The disputing parties may then proceed with litigation in the NCLT or other appropriate legal forums.

7. Legal Framework and Regulatory Guidelines

The Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016 are framed under the Companies Act, 2013, specifically Section 442, which provides the legal authority for the use of mediation and conciliation to resolve corporate disputes. The rules align with the broader objectives of corporate governance and dispute resolution, ensuring a structured and efficient method for resolving business disputes.

These rules also form part of India’s efforts to provide alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, reducing the burden on the formal judicial system and promoting a quicker resolution of corporate conflicts.

8. Penalties for Non-Compliance

  • The rules do not directly specify penalties for non-compliance with the mediation and conciliation process. However, failure to comply with the settlement agreement or any directions given by the NCLT may result in consequences, such as:
    • Imposition of fines.
    • Contempt of court proceedings if the parties do not abide by the settlement terms.

9. Advantages of Mediation and Conciliation

  • Cost-Effective: Mediation and conciliation processes are generally less expensive than litigation, reducing the financial burden on companies involved in disputes.
  • Time-Efficient: The ADR process is quicker, with a timeframe of 60 days for resolving disputes.
  • Confidential: The process remains confidential, protecting the reputations and business interests of the companies involved.
  • Flexibility: The process is voluntary and flexible, allowing the parties to reach a mutually agreeable solution without the need for a formal court judgment.

10. Conclusion

The Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016 provide a structured framework for resolving corporate disputes through mediation and conciliation. These rules promote the efficient resolution of conflicts between companies and their stakeholders, facilitating the growth of a harmonious business environment. By reducing the need for litigation, the process saves time and resources while allowing parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements in a confidential and cost-effective manner.

Incorporating ADR mechanisms into corporate dispute resolution aligns with global trends and fosters a culture of negotiation and settlement within India's corporate legal landscape.

 

By: YAGAY andSUN - May 7, 2025

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates