Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2005 (8) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (8) TMI 352 - SUPREME COURTWhether continuation of the proceedings initiated against Shri Snigdha Kanti Bagchi (hereinafter referred to as the "employee') after the data of his superannuation was illegal without jurisdiction? Held that:- Appeal allowed. In terms of Rule 20-A and 20-B the bank had the discretion to continue the service of an employee for the purpose of continuance and conclusions of the departmental proceedings. The High Court was, therefore, clearly in error in holding order of dismissal from service to be bad. Respondents 1 and 2 have highlighted the alleged withdrawal of grievances of the account-holder and the absence of any loss to the bank.
|