Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2004 (9) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (9) TMI 605 - SC - Companies LawRevision petition allowed by High Court and the order of discharge made by the trial court set aside - Held that:- In our opinion the High Court was correct in coming to the conclusion once the plea of the accused is recorded under Section 252 of the Code the procedure contemplated under Chapter XX has to be followed which is to take the trial to its logical conclusion. As observed by us in Adalat Prasad's case [2004 (8) TMI 647 - SUPREME COURT] the only remedy available to an aggrieved accused to challenge an order in an interlocutory stage is the extraordinary remedy under Section 482 of the Code and not by way of an application to recall the summons or to seek discharge which is not contemplated in the trial of a summons case. Appeal dismissed.
|