Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1999 (1) TMI 518 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURTExtract: ....... by the section itself, i.e., on the basis of the total collection made as charge for marriage hall per day. It was not necessary that there should have been a definition of luxury provided in a marriage hall . 11.. In view of the above, I do not consider that any case for interference is made out. 12.. Petitions are dismissed. Petitions dismissed.
|