Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (9) TMI 96 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Cenvat credit on Rent a Cab Services, Telephone Services, and Contract Bus Services for the period 2006-07 to 2010-11.

Analysis:
1. The dispute revolves around the Cenvat credit taken by the appellant on Rent a Cab Services, Telephone Services, and Contract Bus Services. The amount demanded, along with interest, totals Rs. 1,84,920, with an additional penalty imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The credit was taken by the corporate office in Chennai as an input service distributor passed on to their factory in Papanasam, Thanjavur for excise duty payment.

2. The adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeal) held that the services provided to officers and executives at the corporate office were not directly related to manufacturing activities. They argued that services like Rent a Cab, Telephone, and Contract Bus Services for personal comfort and welfare do not qualify as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The authorities relied on various legal precedents to support their decision.

3. The Counsel for the appellant argued that the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules includes services used in relation to business activities, such as accounting, auditing, financing, and quality control. They contended that the corporate office's management is essential for the manufacturing process to continue, justifying the inclusion of such services as input services. The Counsel presented legal precedents supporting their argument.

4. The Tribunal analyzed the various decisions cited by both parties and emphasized the importance of the corporate office's role in managing the business, including activities relating to business listed in the inclusive portion of the input service definition. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that services provided to the corporate office do not qualify as input services, highlighting the uniformity in court views regarding services like Rent a Cab utilized for transporting workers or executives to the factory.

5. The Tribunal concluded that the services availed by the corporate office, including Rent a Cab, Telephone, and Contract Bus Services, qualify as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of these services for the smooth functioning of the manufacturing business.

This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive overview of the issues involved and the Tribunal's decision regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on the services in question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates