Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2013 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (10) TMI 130 - AT - Service TaxSurvey and Exploration of Mineral Oil and Gas Service Waiver of Pre-deposit Held that - Revenue contended that on perusal of the agreement, it was clearly evident that they have rendered the service under the category Survey and Exploration of Mineral Oil and Gas Service - After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records there was force in the Contention of the Revenue the Commissioner (Appeals) for the earlier period had accepted the classification of the service as contended by the learned counsel - After considering the submissions of both sides, we find that the deposit already made by the applicant was sufficient for waiver of predeposit of balance dues - it was made clear that the deposit made by the applicant would be accepted subject to verification by the Divisional Office - Stay granted.
Issues: Application for waiver of predeposit of tax under the category 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral Oil & Gas Service' for the period October 2007 to May 2008.
Analysis: The applicant sought waiver of predeposit of tax amounting to Rs.85,51,801/- along with interest and penalty for the specified period. The dispute revolved around the classification of services provided under an integral contract with M/s. Shiv Vani Oil & Gas Exploration Services Ltd. for Shot Hole Drilling and Seismic Surveys in Gujarat for the field season 2007-08. The applicant contested that they were not engaged in exploration of mineral oil and gas services, arguing that the main contractor should bear the tax liability. However, due to legal disputes with the main contractor, they were unable to produce supporting documents. The applicant relied on a previous Tribunal decision and claimed that a partial tax amount had already been deposited. Additionally, they highlighted a refund allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for an earlier period based on a classification issue, which was rejected on the grounds of unjust enrichment. The applicant also raised the defense of the demand being time-barred. On the contrary, the Revenue's representative contended that the agreement clearly indicated that the services fell under the category of 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral Oil and Gas Service'. It was argued that the applicant did not dispute the tax liability before the adjudicating authority, asserting that the main contractor was responsible for payment. A report from the Divisional Office was cited to support the claim that the main contractor had not fulfilled the tax obligation. After hearing both parties and examining the records, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue's position, noting the acceptance of service classification by the Commissioner (Appeals) for a previous period. The Tribunal found the deposit made by the applicant to be sufficient for waiving the predeposit of the remaining dues. However, it was stipulated that the acceptance of the deposit was subject to verification by the Divisional Office. Consequently, the stay application was disposed of under the specified conditions.
|