Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (3) TMI 135 - BOMBAY HIGH COURTWhether the CESTAT is right in law in directing the revenue to release the confiscated vessel while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962? - Held that:- The order dated [2014 (3) TMI 82 - CESTAT MUMBAI] which is impugned before us is not an order passed under proviso to Section 129 of the Customs Act 1962 but is an order passed by the Tribunal in its inherent jurisdiction in exercise of it powers as an appellate authority in a pending appeal. In the above view of the matter the question of law as proposed by the revenue is not a substantial question of law and therefore, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal. - appeal dismissed - decided against the revenue.
|