Feedback   New User   Subscription   Demo   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise HC Central Excise + HC
← Previous Next →
  • Contents
  • Cases Cited


User Login
Stay sign in     

Forget password        New User/ Regiser

Annual Subscription

Demo / Trial Options


The ICFAI University Meghalaya Versus The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad

Maintainability of Rectification of mistake application - rejection on the ground of interpretation of Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 - it was construed that the ROM applications could be entertained and decided only by the same CEO, who passed the original orders, and that as such officer was no longer available in the office, his successor, i.e. the Principal Commissioner, has no authority to entertain and pass orders on the ROM applications. - Held that - If we literally construe the wor....... + More



← Previous Next →




Discussion Forum
what is new what is new


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version