Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2018 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (5) TMI 1330 - HC - GSTConditional order of stay - claim of petitioner is that the reason for condition imposed is not stated by 2nd respondent - Held that: - In Ext.P4 order, the 2nd respondent does not state reasons as to why the petitioner was required to deposit the amounts as a condition for the grant of stay - This Court has held in Archana Agencies v Commercial Tax Officer [2014 (5) TMI 1024 - KERALA HIGH COURT] that an authority considering a stay petition is bound to give reasons even while granting conditional stay - the 2nd respondent is directed to pass fresh orders on the stay application preferred by the petitioner, after hearing the petitioner - petition disposed off.
|