Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + AT Money Laundering - 2019 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 136 - AT - Money LaunderingPrevention of Money Laundering - no cogent evidence provided by the ED in order to show that the appellant has any link and nexus with any alleged accused parties - HELD THAT:- No plea of the appellant has been referred wherein it was stated that the appellant was the buyer of the property and Mrs. Nirmala Jain was the seller of the said property and due to personal reasons on the part of the seller the sale of the property did not take place in favour of the appellant. Thus, her name should be deleted as respondent. The appellant thus before this Tribunal claiming no right in the property. She was arrayed as defendant no. 50 in the application. Respondent says that since she is claiming no right and title in the property, her name may be deleted. Even, no prosecution complaint has been filed under section 8(3)(a) of the Act. Ninety days period has already been expired. Therefore, the impugned order against the appellant is set-aside by allowing the present appeal.
|