Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (7) TMI 521 - AT - Service TaxTaxable service or not - interconnection usage for SMS provided by the Appellant to the said 6 telecom service providers - no consideration/ charges agreed upon between the Appellant and the said 6 Telecom operators - no agreement/contract arrived at and executed with the aforesaid 6 Telecom service providers with regard to charges for interconnection usage for SMS - no Invoices were raised by the Appellant on the said 6 Telecom service providers - demand of service tax with interest and penalty - extended period of limitation - period prior to November 2012, i.e. April 2011 to September 2012. HELD THAT:- The settled legal position is that where a service is rendered free without charging any consideration, the same does not attract service tax - It must therefore follow that as admittedly during the period April 2011 to September 2012, no amount was charged and paid for providing Interconnection usage for SMS, there was no taxable service. The definition of service given in Section 65B (44) of the Finance Act 1994 requires that to constitute a service, the activity carried out by a person for another should be for consideration - In the present case, the telecom service providers in question declined to enter into agreements providing for charging of consideration for the interconnection usage for SMS and no amount was charged and paid for the interconnection usage for SMS. Issuance of invoice - Applicability of POT Rules - HELD THAT:- The issuance of an Invoice pre-supposes and requires the existence of an agreement/ contract between the parties under which the parties have agreed upon a consideration/ charge/ price for a sale or service. An Invoice is a commercial document issued for debiting the recipient of goods/ service with the agreed price. This, in the first place, requires the existence of an agreed price. When there is no contract/ agreement, as in the present case and hence no price/ consideration is agreed upon, the question of issuing an Invoice for the same does not arise - Since there was no issue of Invoice, the point of taxation under Rule 3(a) of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, has not occurred - Since the point of taxation has not occurred under any of the clauses of the said Rule 3, the liability to pay service tax has not arisen. Extended period of limitation - HELD THAT:- The SCN is also bad for invoking extended period of limitation as enquiry in the transaction under dispute had started in February, 2013 whereas the show cause notice was issued only on 31.03.2014 for the period under dispute April, 2011 to September, 2012. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|