Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (3) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (3) TMI 158 - HC - Income TaxProceedings under Section 132 - Unaccounted income not been reported to tax - permit the petitioner to seek custody of the seized assets ie., cash of ₹ 76,02,010/- - person entitled to seize and to have custody of the property in the shape of undisclosed income - complainant submitted that though the seized amount was not disclosed to the Income Tax Authority and when the Income Tax Authorities initiated proceedings under Section 132 of the Act, they are entitled for the cash only after completion of the assessment proceedings - HELD THAT:- Admittedly, the Income Tax Authority initiated proceedings under Section 132 of the Act and issued summons under Section 131(1A) of the Act and in response, he appeared for enquiry and his statement was recorded under Section 131 of the Act on 19.04.2021. In the statement, the complainant admitted that the cash belonged to him and it is his unaccounted income which has not been reported to tax. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the complainant, the Income Tax Authority initiated proceedings under Section 132 of the Act as against the complainant for non-disclosure of the income to the tune of ₹ 76,02,010/- and the said proceeding is pending. Once the assessment procedure have become final and concluded, the Income Tax Authority is entitled to get the portion of the amount due and recoverable from the complainant. In the judgment relied upon by the Income Tax Authority reported in Babu Rao Vs. the Inspector of Police [1990 (11) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] already the learned Judicial Magistrate released the cash in favour of the Income Tax Authority and the same was challenged by the owner of the cash and the same was dismissed saying that the Income Tax Authorities, in the eye of law, can be construed as the person entitled to seize and to have custody of the property in the shape of undisclosed income. Whereas in the case on hand, the Income Tax Authority did not file any petition under Section 451 of Cr.P.C for return of cash. The complainant filed a petition for return of cash and the same was allowed and imposed conditions. The complainant challenging the conditions imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram, filed Crl.M.P.No.9990 of 2021 in Crl.M.P.No. 1494 of 2021. Therefore, the above Judgment cited by the learned counsel for the Income Tax Authority is not helpful to the case on hand. Further, the complainant is not entitled to have custody of the cash, since the Income Tax Authority already initiated proceedings under Section 132 of the Act as against the complainant. The order passed on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram is set aside. The property, namely, the cash of ₹ 76,02,010/- deposited in R.P.No.18 of 2021 in Crime on the file of the second respondent police will have to be remained in the custody of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram, pending finalization of the assessment proceedings raised by the Income Tax Authority. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram, is directed to deposit the cash property in any one of the Nationalized Bank in the form of fixed deposit. After completing the assessment proceedings, the Income Tax Authority is at liberty to approach the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram to release the portion of the amount due recoverable from the complainant.
|