Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (4) TMI 970 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A - AO has computed the disallowance which constituted disallowance under Rule 8D in so far as the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) being 0.5% of the average value of investment is not in dispute - CIT (A) has restricted the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act to the extent of exempt income earned - HELD THAT:- We have already incorporated the observations of the AO and the assessee’s explanation as to why interest expenditure should not have been disallowed on the facts of the present case. Nowhere the AO has made any observation on these submissions that no interest can be disallowed or recorded his satisfaction as to why the claim of the assessee is not tenable having regard to the books of accounts and the nature of expenditure debited to the profit and loss account. He has mechanically proceeded to make the disallowance u/s 14A without rebutting to assessee’s specific claim made before him. Here in this case as is evident from the order AO has nowhere records his satisfaction except for general remarks de-hors the facts of the case and explanation given by the assessee. He has not even examined that assessee had surplus funds which were interest free of more than ₹ 556.07 crores as against the exempt income earning investment of ₹ 63.66 crores. Thus, interest expenditure could not have been disallowed. Now in the latest judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of South Indian Bank [2021 (9) TMI 566 - SUPREME COURT] wherein it has been held that where assessee had interest free funds available which exceeds the investment made in tax free fund security then no interest expenditure can be disallowed and it has to be presumed that it is out of assessee’s own fund and proportionate disallowance could not warrant under section 14A even where no separate accounts were maintained by the assessee and other expenditure made for earning tax free income. Disallowance could be legally impermissible for the investment made by the assessee in bonds/shares using interest free funds under Section 14A. Thus proportionate disallowance of interest is not warranted under section 14A for investments made in tax-free bonds/ securities which yielded tax free dividend and interest to assessee banks where interest free funds are available exceeded their investments. Thus, no disallowance on account of section 14A can be made. The disallowance as made by the Assessing Officer under Rule 8D(2)(iii) is deleted. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
|