Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (7) TMI 757 - DELHI HIGH COURTSeeking grant of Anticipatory bail - seizure of Gold Coins and Gold Bars - involved in the creation of numerous fake firms - HELD THAT:- It has already been observed that no whisper was made on behalf of the complainant from 25.01.2022 till 19.03.2022 despite being represented through counsels in proceedings initiated by him, with reference to raid conducted on 25.01.2022. The signatures of Yogesh Mittal are duly appended on copy of panchnama which had been produced on 12.04.2022 during course of submissions by counsel for petitioner. In view of above, it cannot be assumed that Yogesh Mittal or Saurabh Mittal (son of Yogesh Mittal) were not aware of the contents of panchbama dated 25.01.2022. Even otherwise, during the course of proceedings, the petitioner Aishwarya Attrey as well as Ritesh only subsequently joined the proceedings as referred in panchnama. Further, no recovery of the gold has been effected despite joining of the investigation by the petitioner pursuant to the interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 12.04.2022. On the basis of recoveries effected from the residential/rental premises of the petitioner, no incriminating evidence pertaining to the proceedings conducted by the raiding party have been brought on record except to the extent that a cash of Rs.11 lacs was recovered from the premises. The explanation for the same is stated to have been given by the petitioner during the course of investigation and can be duly investigated in accordance with law. The petitioner is admitted to bail subject to furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.1 lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/learned Trial Court concerned and subject to conditions imposed - application allowed.
|