9911796707🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Follow us:
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (6) TMI 1704 - AT - Income TaxDenial of approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) - charitable activity u/s 2(15) - as per CIT(A) appellant had not furnished sufficient details or proof of the activities of the trust/Institution within the meaning of section 2(15) - assessee submitted that the fee receipts are the revenue generated out of the regular activities carried on by the institution and they have not been issued any certificate u/s. 80G like any other donations and CIT(E) grossly erred in ignoring the Capital expenditure applied during the year as application as well as accumulation u/s. 11(1)(a) of the Act HELD THAT - The scope of enquiry by CIT(E) while dealing with the application for grant of approval u/s. 80G of the Act extends only to the satisfaction of the genuineness of the activities of such trust/institutions and the fulfillment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of Section 80G(5) of the Act and not the actual computation of surplus. We are also of the opinion that the provisions of section 11 12 along with section 13 including application of fund by the charitable organization are to be examined during the course of assessment proceedings and not at the time of granting approval u/s 80G of the Act. Private institutions like assessee trust are well funded by high fee receipts and management fee which undergoes an increase every year does not commensurately passed on in terms of tangible and intangible facilities we are of the considered opinion that the ld. CIT(E) did not point out any specific circumstances under which the fees received had not been commensurately passed on in terms of tangible and intangible facilities. These are merely sweeping statement without any corroborative evidence. The ld. CIT(E) in her order did not even whisper about any activity of the trust to be non-genuine. Fees receipts which are forming part of the total receipts the ld. CIT(E) is of the view that these receipts do not fall within the purview of the donation u/s. 80G of the Act - The fee receipts are nothing but the revenue generated out of the regular activity carried on by the assessee trust and the assessee trust never granted 80G certificates on such fees receipts. We are of the considered opinion that mere fact of the assessee being an educational institution which received tuition other fees along with hostel fees the approval u/s 80G of the Act cannot be denied specially when it is established for the charitable purposes within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act and the registration u/s 12A of the Act has already been granted after verifying the genuineness of the activities carried out by the Assessee trust. The issues whether receipts in the form of tuition and other fees hostel fees do not fall under the definition of donation are not at all relevant in the present case of the assessee trust. For the purpose of granting approval u/s 80G of the Act the only relevant section is sub-sections (5). The ld. Commissioner (Exemptions) after receiving the application for granting approval u/s 80G of the Act shall call for such document or information and make such enquiry as he/she thinks necessary in order to satisfy himself/herself about the genuineness of the activity of such institution or fund and the fulfillment of all the conditions laid down in clause. Thus we are of the opinion that at the time of granting of approval u/s 80G of the Act the authority has to satisfy herself that the chartable institution is established in India for charitable purposes and the activities of the assessee trust are genuine and the assessee trust also fulfilled all the conditions as mentioned above. The ld. CIT(Exemptions) in our view has also not brought any material on record to show that the activities of the assessee trust are not genuine or the conditions as specified above are not fulfilled by the assessee trust. Allow the appeal of the assessee trust and direct the ld. CIT(Exemptions) to grant approval u/s 80G of the Act to the assessee trust as applied in form 10AB on 08.08.2024.
The core legal questions considered in this appeal revolve around the denial of approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to a trust engaged in charitable activities. The principal issues include:
1. Whether the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application for approval under section 80G(5)(iii) despite having granted registration under section 12AB of the Act. 2. Whether the assessee trust furnished sufficient details and proof of its activities within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act. 3. Whether the denial of approval under section 80G was justified on the ground that the trust reported surplus income not applied towards charitable purposes and accumulated in fixed deposits earning interest. 4. Whether fee receipts and management fees received by the trust are to be considered as donations eligible for deduction under section 80G. 5. Whether the learned Commissioner erred in not allowing capital expenditure and accumulation of income under section 11(1) and 11(1)(a) of the Act as application of income. 6. The scope and parameters for granting approval under section 80G, including the relevant conditions under section 80G(5). Regarding the first issue concerning the rejection of approval under section 80G despite registration under section 12AB, the Court noted that registration under section 12A is granted only after the Commissioner is satisfied about the genuineness of the trust's activities and compliance with applicable laws. The trust had also been granted provisional approval under section 80G initially. The Court emphasized that the scope of enquiry for approval under section 80G is limited to satisfaction about genuineness of activities and fulfillment of conditions under section 80G(5), and not a detailed scrutiny of income application or surplus computation, which are matters for assessment proceedings under sections 11, 12, and 13. The Court observed that the learned Commissioner did not bring any material to show that the trust's activities were not genuine or that the conditions for approval were not met. On the issue of surplus income and accumulation, the Commissioner had rejected approval partly because the trust reported surplus income each year which was not applied towards charitable purposes but accumulated in fixed deposits earning interest. The assessee contended that capital expenditure applied during the year and accumulation of 15% of income under section 11(1)(a) qualify as application of income and should not be treated as surplus. The Court examined the Income & Expenditure accounts and found substantial application towards educational activities. It held that the question of application of income and surplus is not to be examined at the stage of granting approval under section 80G but during assessment proceedings. Thus, the Commissioner's rejection on this ground was not justified. Regarding the contention that the trust was well-funded by high fee receipts and management fees which were not commensurately passed on in terms of tangible or intangible facilities, the Court found that the Commissioner made only a general observation without any specific evidence or corroboration. The Commissioner did not allege any non-genuine activity. Therefore, this ground was insufficient to deny approval. On the issue of fee receipts and their treatment under section 80G, the Commissioner held that fee receipts do not qualify as donations eligible for deduction. The assessee submitted that fee receipts arise from regular activities (tuition, hostel fees) and that 80G certificates were never issued for such fees. The Court agreed that fee receipts are distinct from donations and that mere receipt of fees does not disqualify the trust from approval under section 80G, especially when the trust also receives donations/grants eligible for deduction. The Court held that the question whether fees are donations is not relevant for approval under section 80G, which focuses on genuineness and fulfillment of conditions under section 80G(5). The Court then examined the statutory framework under section 80G(5), which sets out conditions for approval:
The Court emphasized that the Commissioner's role is to satisfy herself about the genuineness of activities and fulfillment of these conditions before granting approval. In this case, the Commissioner had already granted registration under section 12A and provisional approval under section 80G, indicating satisfaction on these points. The Commissioner failed to bring any material to show non-fulfillment of these conditions at the time of rejection. In conclusion, the Court held that the Commissioner erred in denying approval under section 80G. The rejection was based on grounds outside the scope of enquiry for approval and unsupported by evidence. The Court directed the Commissioner to grant approval under section 80G as applied by the trust. Significant holdings include the following verbatim reasoning:
Core principles established include:
Final determinations on each issue are:
|
