Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1991 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1991 (2) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......ions. Moreover, eye brow pencils were specifically mentioned in the entry. In our opinion eye brow pencils came in for specifications because they were a beauty or make-up preparation and not because they were a preparation for the care of the skin. 5. In the aforesaid view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal which we consequently dismiss.
|