Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 1956 (8) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1956 (8) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF MADRASExtract: .......h which he has been entrusted. The writ asked for is one of prohibition. If the third respondent had jurisdiction to undertake and continue the investigation, the writ asked for cannot issue. The third respondent has that jurisdiction. This application fails. The rule is discharged and this petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
|