Bookmarks   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login  
Tax Management India .com   
   TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
Disclosures on the Website    *    Seeks to amend Notification No. 26/2012- Service Tax dated 20.06.2012, by inserting of entry 5A for transportation of passengers embarking from or terminating in a Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) airports, with abatement of 90%,for a period of one year from the date of commencement of operations of the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) airport, with condition of without taking any CENVAT credit    *    Removal of goods from Depot to Job worker    *    Commercial and Industrial Construction Services - confirmation of tax liability on the appellant on a category which is not alleged in the show-cause notice is traversing beyond the allegations made in the show-cause notice. - Tri    *    Demand of Service Tax in respect of the same transaction on the ground that the deposit of Service Tax was under a different category whereas a different category of service has been provided cannot be held to be justifiable. - Tri    *    Non fulfilling the obligation to deposit the collected tax to the Government of India - No reason to disbelieve their claim of inability to pay tax owing to lack of funds. Such possibilities can and do occur in the world of business. - Levy of penalty waived - Tri    *    Valuation - if it is found that the royalty payment shown in the Books of Account is not related to the present transaction and related to some other transaction, the same cannot be relevant for the valuation in the present case. - Tri    *    Levying tax at 4/5% on the contractee - if the petitioner furnishes proof of payment of tax by the contractors on the very same turnover, to then consider whether tax can be levied on the petitioner as it may then amount to taxing the very same deemed sale of goods twice. - HC    *    Cenvat credit - duty paid goods cleared on their own invoices received back due to defect/rejection - no procedure such as making application or taking permission is required for compliance of Rule 16. - Tri    *    Exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess under Notifications No. 28 and 29/2010 both dated 22.06.2010 is applicable only with respect to Clean Energy Cess levied under the Finance Act, 2010, but will not be applicable with respect to Central Excise duty levied on coal w.e.f 01.03.2011 - Tri    *    Cenvat credit - various light fittings and fixtures were brought into the factory after duty payment and were installed for the intended purposes. To call these items as immovable property is without basis - credit allowed - Tri    *    Unjust enrichment - Refund claim - the amount was deposited by the appellant on the direction of the appellate authorities. - question of unjust enrichment does not arise - Tri    *    WPC for bluetooth headphones.    *    Guarantee executed by the defendant - period of limitation extended on account of the acknowledgement of debt, in terms of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - as there is no acknowledgement of debt, the provision of Section 19 of the said Act, are not attracted to the facts of the present case.- HC    *    Claim for depreciation on the leased vehicles - the finding by the ld. CIT(A) of the character of the lease as an operating lease cannot, under the circumstances, be faulted, and the assessee, accordingly, entitled to its claim for depreciation on the leased vehicles - Tri    *    Depreciation - prior to ending of the relevant financial year, though the assessee had an opportunity to take possession of the property for the purpose of fit-outs, he cannot say that he has put the property to use for the purposes of claim of depreciation u/s 32 of the Act either in respect of building or machinery therein - Tri    *    Addition u/s 145A - inclusion of service tax as part of trading receipts - ection 145A of the Act would have no application in cases where service is provided by the Assessee - HC    *    Loss on account of foreign currency forward/option contracts - It is only at the year end that one can still reconcile the hedging transactions with the actual exposure or delivery and come to a conclusion whether hedging contract exceeded the actual exposure or not but certainly not on week to week or month to month basis. - Tri    *    Exemption u/sec. 54F - net consideration computation to be invested or value fixed u/s 50C as stamp valuation - Under provisions of Sec. 54F of the Act, net consideration has to be invested in the Residential property but not the deeming value being fiction. - Tri    *    service tax payament-reg
Home News News and Press Release Month 4 2011 2011 (4)
← Previous Next →

General Circular No. 15/2011- Appointment of Cost Auditor by Companies

April 19, 2011
  • News
General Circular No. 15/2011


Government of India

Ministry of Corporate Affairs
  Cost Audit Branch

'B-1' Wing, 2d Floor,

Paryavaran Bhawan,

CGO Complex, Lodhi Road,

New Delhi     110 003

Dated the April 11, 2011


The President,

Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India, 12, Sudder Street,

Kolkata 700 016

Subject: Appointment of Cost Auditor by Companies


Ministry has reviewed the existing procedure followed by the companies for seeking prior approval of the Central Government for appointment of cost auditor under section 233B (2) of the Companies Act, 1956. In supersession of any earlier order/circular issued in this regard, the revised procedure to be followed by the companies and cost auditor shall be as under:

(a) The company required to get its cost records audited under section 233B (1) of the Companies Act, 1956 shall appoint a cost auditor who is a cost accountant as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and who holds a valid certificate of practice under sub-section (1) of section 6 of that Act and includes a firm of cost accountants.

(b) The Audit Committee of the Board shall be the first point of reference regarding the appointment of cost auditors.

(c)  The Audit Committee shall ensure that the cost auditor is free from any disqualifications as specified under section 233B (5) read with section 224 and sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 226 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(d) While a cost auditor shall have prime responsibility to ensure that he does not violate the limits specified under section 224 (1-B) of the Companies Act 1956, the Audit Committee shall also be responsible for such compliance by the cost auditor.

(e) The Audit Committee shall obtain a certificate from the cost auditor certifying his/its independence and arm's length relationship with the company.

(f)  The company shall e-file its application with the Central Government on portal, in the prescribed form 23C within ninety days
from the date of commencement of each financial year, along with the  prescribed fee as per the Companies (Fees on Applications) Rules, 1999 as amended from time-to-time and other documents as per existing practice i.e.

(i) certified copy of the Board Resolution proposing appointment of the cost auditor; and

(ii) copy of the certificate obtained from the cost auditor regarding compliance of section 224 (1-B) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(g)  On filing the application, the same shall be deemed to be approved by  the Central Government, unless contrary is heard within thirty days from the date of filing such application.

(h)  If within thirty days from the date of filing such application, the Central Government directs the company to re-submit the said application with such additional information or explanation, as may be specified in that direction, the period of thirty days for deemed approval of the Central Government shall be counted from the date of re-submission by the company.

(i) After expiry of thirty days, as the case may be, the company shall issue formal letter of appointment to the cost auditor, as approved by the Board.

(j)   Within thirty days of receipt of formal letter of appointment from the company, the cost auditor shall inform the Central Government in the prescribed form, alongwith a copy of such appointment. An e-form for the same is being developed and will be notified shortly.

(k) The company shall disclose full particulars of the cost auditor, along with the due date and actual date of filing of the cost audit report by the cost auditor, in its Annual Report for each relevant financial year.

(l)   In those companies where constitution of an Audit Committee of the Board is not required by law, the words "Audit Committee" shall stand substituted by the words "Board of Directors".

2. If a company contravenes any provisions of this circular, the company and every officer thereof who is in default, including the persons referred to in sub-section (6) of section 209 of the Act, shall be punishable as provided under sub-section (2) of section 642 read with sub-sections (5) and (7) of section 209 and sub-section (11) of section 233B of Companies Act, 1956.

3. If default is made by the cost auditor in complying with the aforesaid provisions, he shall be punishable with fine, which may extend to five thousand rupees.

4. The modified procedure contained in this circular shall be effective from the financial year commencing on or after the 1" day of April, 2011.

5. The Institute is requested to bring this to the general information of all Members in practice, and of the corporate sector.

Yours faithfully,


Adviser (Cost)



← Previous Next →
what is new what is new

Advanced Search

Latest Updates




More Options


|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version