Reforming of Taxation of Specified Income of Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs) : Clause 337 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115BBI of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Clause 337 Specified income.

Income Tax Bill, 2025

Introduction

Clause 337 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, introduces a comprehensive regime for the taxation of "specified income" of registered non-profit organisations (NPOs). The provision enumerates various types of income and situations in which such income shall be considered "specified" and subject to tax in a prescribed manner. This clause represents a significant evolution in the legislative approach to the taxation of charitable and religious trusts and institutions, aiming at tightening compliance and accountability. Section 115BBI of the Income-tax Act, 1961, introduced by the Finance Act, 2022 (with effect from 01-04-2023), is the current statutory provision governing the taxation of specified income of certain institutions, including trusts and institutions registered u/s 10(23C) and 11. Section 115BBI lays down a special tax rate and denies deductions/exemptions for certain types of income, specifically targeting violations and non-compliance. The following commentary provides an in-depth analysis of Clause 337, its objectives, detailed provisions, practical implications, and a comparative analysis with Section 115BBI. The aim is to elucidate the legislative intent, operational mechanics, and the impact on stakeholders, as well as to identify areas of continuity, divergence, and potential improvement.

Objective and Purpose

The legislative intent behind Clause 337 appears to be twofold:

1. Ensuring Accountability: By clearly defining and taxing specified income arising from non-compliance or misuse of tax exemptions, the provision seeks to curb the misuse of tax benefits by NPOs.
2. Enhancing Transparency: The clause mandates explicit disclosure and taxation in the year of occurrence, thus bringing greater transparency and traceability to the financial activities of NPOs.

Historically, the taxation of NPOs has been riddled with ambiguities, especially regarding the treatment of income applied in contravention of the law, anonymous donations, and the use of accumulated funds. The existing regime u/s 115BBI was a step towards plugging these loopholes. Clause 337 builds upon this foundation, providing a more granular and comprehensive framework.

Detailed Analysis of Clause 337 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 337 sets out an exhaustive list of "specified income" items, each triggering taxability in the year of occurrence or violation. The provision is structured as a table, with each row specifying a type of income, the triggering event, and the tax year in which it becomes taxable. Below is a detailed analysis of each item:

1. Anonymous Donations (Row 1)

Provision: Any anonymous donation received by a registered non-profit organisation (other than those created or established wholly for religious purposes), excluding anonymous donations up to Rs. 1,00,000 or 5% of such donations received during the tax year, whichever is higher, is taxable in the year of receipt.

Interpretation: This provision targets untraceable or undisclosed donations, which pose a risk of money laundering and misuse of exempt status. By carving out an exemption threshold, it recognises the practical difficulty of tracing every small donation, while ensuring that substantial anonymous donations are brought to tax.

Ambiguity/Issues: The distinction between organisations "wholly for religious purposes" and others may invite interpretational disputes, especially for entities with mixed objects.

2. Income Applied for Benefit of Related Persons (Row 2)

Provision: Any income applied, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of a related person (as prescribed), is taxable in the year of such application.

Interpretation: This is an anti-abuse measure to prevent diversion of funds to insiders or related parties. The manner of computation is to be prescribed, likely mirroring existing rules on related party transactions.

Ambiguity/Issues: The breadth of "directly or indirectly" and the definition of "related person" will be crucial to avoid overreach or loopholes.

3. Income Applied Outside India in Contravention of Section 338(a) (Row 3)

Provision: Any portion of income applied outside India, in contravention of section 338(a), is taxable in the year of application.

Interpretation: This seeks to ensure that tax-exempt funds are utilised within India, except as specifically permitted (e.g., for international relief, with approval).

Ambiguity/Issues: The contours of "contravention" and the scope of permitted overseas application u/s 338(a) will determine the practical impact.

4. Investments in Contravention of Section 350 (Row 4)

Provision: Any investment made in contravention of section 350, out of any income, accumulated income, corpus, deemed corpus, or any other fund, is taxable in the year of investment.

Interpretation: This provision targets investments in prohibited modes (e.g., speculative ventures, non-approved securities), ensuring that funds are deployed prudently and as per regulatory guidelines.

Ambiguity/Issues: The breadth of "any other fund" and retrospective application to accumulated or corpus funds may raise compliance challenges.

5. Violation of Deemed Corpus Donation Conditions (Row 5)

Provision: Any deemed corpus donation in respect of which any of the conditions specified in section 340 is violated, is taxable in the year of violation.

Interpretation: This ensures that corpus donations (which enjoy special treatment) are subject to conditions and that violations trigger tax consequences.

Ambiguity/Issues: The specific conditions section 340 and their interpretation will be critical.

6. Application of Accumulated Income for Non-Charitable/Religious Purposes (Row 6)

Provision: Any portion of accumulated income applied to purposes other than those for which it was accumulated or set apart is taxable in the year of such application.

Interpretation: This provision prevents the misuse of the accumulation facility by ensuring that funds set aside for specific purposes are not diverted.

Ambiguity/Issues: Determining the original purpose and tracking the application may pose practical difficulties.

7. Cessation of Accumulation for Approved Purposes (Row 7)

Provision: Any portion of accumulated income that ceases to be accumulated or set apart for application to approved purposes as specified u/s 342(1) is taxable in the year of cessation.

Interpretation: This provision ensures that once funds are set apart for a purpose, they must remain earmarked until utilised; otherwise, they become taxable.

Ambiguity/Issues: The definition of "ceases to be accumulated" may need clarification.

8. Non-Utilisation of Accumulated Income within the Specified Period (Row 8)

Provision: Any portion of accumulated income not utilised for the specified purpose within the permitted period (as per section 342(1)) is taxable in the last year of accumulation.

Interpretation: This enforces the time-bound application of accumulated funds, preventing indefinite deferral.

Ambiguity/Issues: The mechanism for tracking utilisation and the consequences of partial utilisation need to be addressed.

9. Transfer of Accumulated Income to Other Registered Non-Profits (Row 9)

Provision: Any portion of accumulated income credited or paid to another registered non-profit organisation is taxable in the year of such transfer.

Interpretation: This discourages the practice of "layering" or passing on accumulated funds to other entities, potentially to avoid application or scrutiny.

Ambiguity/Issues: Exceptions, if any (e.g., mergers, legitimate collaborations), need to be clarified.

10. Application of Income to Non-Charitable/Religious Purposes (Row 10)

Provision: Any income applied to purposes other than those for which the entity is registered is taxable in the year of application.

Interpretation: This is a fundamental safeguard to ensure that tax-exempt status is not abused for non-approved activities.

Ambiguity/Issues: The scope of "other than charitable or religious purposes" may be contentious in cases of mixed activities.

11. Business Income Determined by Assessing Officer (Row 11)

Provision: Any income determined by the Assessing Officer u/s 344, in excess of income shown in the books of account of such business undertaking, is taxable in the year to which such income relates.

Interpretation: This addresses under-reporting or misreporting of business income by non-profit entities, ensuring that all income is properly accounted for and taxed if necessary.

Ambiguity/Issues: The interplay with the general provisions on business income and the treatment of such excess income will need careful administration.

Ambiguities and Potential Issues

While Clause 337 is comprehensive, certain areas may require further clarification:

• Definition of Related Person: The precise scope of "related person" is left to prescription, which may lead to interpretational disputes unless defined exhaustively.
• Interaction with Other Provisions: The clause cross-references several other sections (338, 340, 342, 344, 350), making compliance dependent on a web of interrelated provisions.
• Double Taxation Risks: The possibility of the same income being taxed more than once (e.g., as anonymous donation and as misapplied income) cannot be ruled out unless specifically addressed in the rules.

Practical Implications

Clause 337 will have far-reaching implications for NPOs:

• Increased Compliance Burden: NPOs will need to maintain meticulous records, ensure strict adherence to prescribed investment norms, and monitor the end-use of accumulated funds.
• Risk of Retrospective Taxation: Since the taxability is linked to the year of occurrence of the violation, NPOs may face tax demands for past actions if detected in subsequent assessments.
• Impact on Donor Confidence: Enhanced scrutiny and the risk of loss of exemption may affect donor perceptions, particularly for large donors seeking certainty.
• Regulatory Oversight: The provision empowers tax authorities to scrutinize not just the end-use but also the process (e.g., whether investments are in permitted modes, whether corpus donations comply with conditions, etc.).

Comparative Analysis with Section 115BBI of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Both Clause 337 and Section 115BBI share the common objective of taxing certain forms of income arising from violations or misapplications by non-profit organisations. However, there are notable differences in their approach, structure, and scope:

1. Definition and Enumeration of Specified Income

Section 115BBI: The section defines "specified income" in an inclusive and reference-based manner, linking it to violations of accumulation limits, deemed income under certain explanations/provisos, and income not excluded from exemption due to violations. The references are largely to provisions in section 10(23C), section 11, and section 13.
Clause 337: The clause adopts a tabular and exhaustive approach, explicitly listing each category of specified income, the triggering event, and the tax year. The list is broader and more granular, covering anonymous donations, related party benefits, overseas applications, investment violations, corpus donation conditions, accumulation violations, transfers to other non-profits, and business income discrepancies.

2. Scope and Coverage

Section 115BBI: Applies to a broader class of entities (funds/institutions u/s 10(23C), trusts u/s 11, etc.), but the definition of specified income is narrower and relies on cross-references.
Clause 337: Applies specifically to "registered non-profit organisations," but the definition of specified income is broader and more detailed, covering a wider range of violations and circumstances.

3. Tax Rate and Computation

Section 115BBI: Prescribes a flat tax rate of 30% on specified income, with no deductions or allowances permitted in computing such income.
Clause 337: Does not, in itself, specify the tax rate, but identifies the income that is to be taxed. The applicable rate and bar on deductions may be specified elsewhere in the Bill, likely mirroring the approach of Section 115BBI.

4. Timing of Taxation

Section 115BBI: Tax is levied in the year in which the specified income arises, as per the definitions and cross-referenced provisions.
Clause 337: The table explicitly states the tax year for each type of specified income, ensuring clarity and reducing disputes about timing.

5. Nature of Violations Covered

Section 115BBI: Focuses on violations related to accumulation, deemed income, and loss of exemption due to violation of specific conditions.
Clause 337: Covers a much wider array of violations, including anonymous donations, related party transactions, overseas application, investment violations, corpus donation conditions, application to non-charitable purposes, and business income discrepancies.

6. Exemptions and Thresholds

Section 115BBI: Does not provide explicit thresholds for anonymous donations or other categories; relies on referenced provisions.
Clause 337: Explicitly carves out an exemption for small anonymous donations (up to Rs. 1,00,000 or 5% of receipts), providing relief for minor infractions.

7. Administrative Clarity

Section 115BBI: The reliance on cross-references may lead to interpretational complexity and disputes.
Clause 337: The tabular, itemised approach enhances administrative clarity, making it easier for both taxpayers and authorities to identify taxable events.

8. Treatment of Business Income

Section 115BBI: Does not specifically address discrepancies in business income reported by non-profits.
Clause 337: Specifically brings to tax any excess income determined by the Assessing Officer over what is reported in the books, closing a potential loophole.

Comparative Table

Aspect	Section 115BBI of the Income-tax Act, 1961	Clause 337 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025	Comments
Scope	Applies to institutions u/s 10(23C)(iv)-(via) and section 11.	Applies to all registered non-profit organisations.	Clause 337 is broader, potentially covering more entities.
Definition of Specified Income	Defined in Explanation; includes income accumulated in excess, deemed income, income not exempt due to violations, etc.	Enumerates 11 specific items, including anonymous donations, misapplication, violations, etc.	Clause 337 is more granular and includes items not expressly covered in 115BBI (e.g., anonymous donations, investment contraventions).
Tax Rate	30% on specified income.	Not specified in Clause 337; likely to be prescribed elsewhere in the Bill.	Need to refer to the Bill for the applicable rate.
Year of Taxability	Not specified in detail; generally year of accrual/recognition.	Explicitly linked to year of occurrence/action/violation.	Clause 337 provides greater certainty and traceability.
Anonymous Donations	Not specifically covered under Section 115BBI; covered u/s 115BBC.	Explicitly included as specified income (with threshold exemption).	Clause 337 consolidates this aspect within the specified income regime.
Related Party Transactions	Covered indirectly via violation of section 13(1)(c).	Directly included as specified income.	Clause 337 is more explicit.
Accumulated Income	Covered if not utilized as per law.	Multiple scenarios covered in detail (application, cessation, credit to other NPOs, etc.).	Clause 337 provides a more nuanced treatment.
Investment Violations	Covered via deemed income provisions.	Directly included as specified income.	Clause 337 is more direct and comprehensive.
Deduction/Set-off	No deduction, allowance, or set-off permitted against specified income.	Not specified in Clause 337; likely similar restriction elsewhere in the Bill.	Alignment expected, but needs confirmation.

Key Points of Convergence and Divergence

• Convergence: Both provisions target similar mischiefs: accumulation beyond permissible limits, misapplication, violations of exemption conditions, and related party transactions.
• Divergence: Clause 337 is more detailed, bringing within its ambit additional categories such as anonymous donations (with a threshold), investment violations, and explicit treatment of income credited to other NPOs.
• Structural Improvement: Clause 337's tabular format and explicit linkage to the year of occurrence provide greater clarity and operational ease for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

Potential Conflicts and Overlaps

The coexistence of multiple provisions targeting similar conduct (e.g., anonymous donations u/s 115BBC and under Clause 337) may lead to confusion unless harmonized. The new Bill appears to consolidate and streamline these aspects, but transitional provisions will be critical to avoid double jeopardy.

Practical Implications for Stakeholders

• NPOs: Will need to enhance governance, internal controls, and compliance mechanisms. There is a greater risk of adverse tax consequences for even inadvertent lapses.
• Donors: May seek greater assurance from NPOs regarding compliance, potentially affecting fundraising.
• Tax Authorities: Will benefit from clearer triggers for taxability and enhanced tools for enforcement.
• Advisors and Auditors: Will need to reorient compliance checklists and advise clients on new risk areas.

Comparative Perspective: Other Jurisdictions

Globally, the trend is towards increasing scrutiny of charitable and non-profit organisations, especially regarding transparency of funding, prevention of money laundering, and ensuring that tax benefits are not abused. The move towards explicit triggers for loss of exemption and immediate taxation of misapplied funds aligns India's approach with best practices seen in jurisdictions such as the UK and the US, where similar rules exist for "unrelated business income" and "excess benefit transactions."

Conclusion

Clause 337 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, marks a significant step forward in the regulation and taxation of NPOs. By providing a detailed, event-based framework for the taxation of specified income, it addresses many of the loopholes and ambiguities present in the current regime under Section 115BBI. The provision is comprehensive, forward-looking, and aligns with global best practices. However, successful implementation will depend on clear definitions, harmonization with related provisions, and robust transitional arrangements. Stakeholders will need to adapt to the enhanced compliance environment, and the tax administration must ensure that enforcement is fair, consistent, and non-disruptive to genuine charitable activity.

---

Full Text:

Clause 337 Specified income.

 

Dated: 5-5-2025