Tax Management India. Com
                            Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals News SMS Articles Highlights
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

← Previous Next →

Reimbursement of expenses paid abroad, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 111316
Dated: 4-1-2017
By:- Yatin Bhopi
Reimbursement of expenses paid abroad

  • Contents

Dear expert

We are manufacture and multinational company. We export our products in foreign countries. To sell our products in European countries we required to register our product in certain authorities in Europe.

One of our associate company situated there paid the required registration fees and raised the bill for reimbursement of expenses made on behalf of us.

Please share your views whether Service tax is applicable on this reimbursement expenses under RCM and if payable whether CENVAT credit will be available to us?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 12 of 12 Records

1 Dated: 4-1-2017

Not taxable.

2 Dated: 4-1-2017

Kasthuri Sir, can I know the logic behind your conclusion?

3 Dated: 4-1-2017

Section 66A of the finance act 1994.provide the discharge of servicetax liability on RCM it further provide that establishments of person in india and outside india shall be treated as separate persons.

4 Dated: 4-1-2017

I request the readers in this forum to please go through the Tech Mahindra decision reported in 2016(9) TMI 191-CESTAT Mumbai and after reading the same offer your comments on this issue.


K.G Subramanian

5 Dated: 4-1-2017
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

The case law states that the branch of an entity in India is not different. So the money paid by the branch and reimbursed by Head Office is mere reimbursement and hence not taxable under service tax.

6 Dated: 5-1-2017

Sh.Mariappan Govindarajan Sir,

Reasons and logic behind my reply are as under:-

(1) This service is in relation to exported goods. Exported goods cannot be sold in a foreign country without registration of the same. Goods and service both are related and cannot be separated and both are consumed/enjoyed in a foreign country/non-taxable territory.

2. Registration fee is statutory levy of the foreign country. It is not of commercial nature.

3. All reimbursement expenses are not liable to Service Tax.

4 Everything happened in foreign except reimbursement.

5. Remaining reasons are given by Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani, Sir which are based on the judgement cited.

7 Dated: 5-1-2017
By:- Suryanarayana Sathineni

Dear Friend,

With due respects to the views expressed by our learned friends, I respectfully submit that I have a different view on this issue.

Firstly the issue is reimbursement of the expenses incurred by foreign subsidiary for payment of regulatory fees ( product Registration etc.,) to the government of a particular country with regard to Registration and marketing of the products in that particular country /countries.

As already stated , the subsidiary abroad is treated as a distinct person for the purposes of Service Tax.

any amount paid as fees for such statutory functions, though reimbursed, is liable for ST under reverse charge mechanism more specifically from 1.4.2016 in view of deletion of certain services provided by Government deleted from the negative list.

You may also pl. refer the decision of Mumbai CESTAT reported in TMI under citation 2016 (4) TMI 111 - CESTAT MUMBAI, where the Hon'ble CESTAT held that ST is not payable on the fees paid to US FDA and oather Regulatory Authorities ( this issue related prior to 01.04.2016).

In view of the above, I am of the considered view that the subject expences are liable to ST under Reverse charge Mechanism.

Best Regards


8 Dated: 5-1-2017
By:- Yatin Bhopi

Thanks Sir

And also this is registration fees and I think there is no any service involved.

9 Dated: 5-1-2017

I endorse the views of Shri Suryanarayana

10 Dated: 6-1-2017

Sh.Yatin Bhopi Ji,

There is no doubt that this activity is service and covered under the category of "Intellectual Property Services" under erstwhile Section 65 (55 b) of the Finance Act which includes intangible and tangible objects.

Further I agree with both experts, namely, Sh.Suryanarayan Sir and Sh.Mariappan Govindarajan, Sir as this is the correct legal position.

However, keeping in view recurring effect, Service and exported product both being enmeshed and consumption of both outside India, the issue is worth raising before the Board through representation.


11 Dated: 7-1-2017
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

This is the right time to make representation. As there are many representation being made for GST. The government would consider this point of contention if raised at this point of time.

12 Dated: 8-1-2017

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

Yes because this service is chained to exported product. In this context, Board's circulars no.111/5/2009-ST dated 24.2.2009 and 141/10/2011-TRU dated 13.5.2011 which pertain to Pre-RCM period are relevant for raising issue before the Board. These circulars lay emphasis on consumption and enjoyment of service outside India.


Old Query - New Comments are closed.

← Previous Next →
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.