Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

TAX VALUE BASED ON PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT OR ACTUAL COST, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 118204
Dated: 31-10-2022
By:- RV PERUMAL

TAX VALUE BASED ON PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT OR ACTUAL COST


  • Contents

MY CLIENT IS ONE OF THE WORKS CONTRACT SERVICE PROVIDER. FOR THE YEAR 2016-17, HE PAID THE TAX IN 60:40 BUT AS PER THE AUDITED PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT THE DEPARTMENT DEMANDED TO PAY SERVICE TAX BECAUSE THE COST OF MATERIAL IS LESS THAN 60%. THE DEPARTMENT HAS ASCERTAINED THE PURCHASE VALUE FROM THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS. ACTUALLY THE PURCHASE IS CORRECT. WHETHER ANY WAY TO PROVE 60% IS THE RIGHT ONE OR NOT? IF ANY JUDGMENTS OR NOTES AVAILABLE PLEASE PROVIDE

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 2-11-2022
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.R.V. PERUMAL Ji,

First preference for valuation is on actual basis. If the assessee is unable to split ‘Sale & Service’, then he can resort to deemed sale method i.e. 60 : 40. In this scenario, the assessee is able to segregate between the figures of sale & service. Rule 2A of Service Tax (Determination) Valuation Rules, 2006 is very much clear. Hence your client is hoping against hope. The burden of proof is cast upon the assesse who intends to avail exemption or concessional rate of tax. ST and VAT are mutually exclusive but proof of payment of VAT on the portion of 60% is required to be produced by the assesse in order to avail exemption on sale value portion of 60%.

Thus the view/objection of the department is correct.


2 Dated: 3-11-2022
By:- RV PERUMAL

Respected Sri Kasthuriji

Thank you very much for your immediate sharp reply


3 Dated: 8-11-2022
By:- Amit Agrawal

Assuming that VAT was also paid under composition scheme available under VAT (i.e. similar to what is done for service tax by your client under Rule 2A (ii) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006), Department cannot use 'purchase price of material' - as can be seen from P&L - to force your client to pay additional service tax.

In any case, client's 'Purchase Price of material / goods' is not equivalent to 'value of property in goods transferred in the execution of the said works contract'.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.


4 Dated: 8-11-2022
By:- RV PERUMAL

Thank you very much Sri Amithji


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates