9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (11) TMI 330X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er dated 2-7-2008 (Annexure P-30) passed by Central Information Commission, directing the petitioner to disclose information in respect of marks obtained by respondent No. 2 in written test; interview as well as marks obtained by the last candidate who was found suitable to be promoted. The petitioner has been further directed to disclose to respondent No. 2 his annual confidential reports. 2. It ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he petitioner, we do not find any merit in the present petition. The petitioner is a state within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and is bound to act fairly and to consider all the eligible candidate for promotion in accordance with the Rules and guidelines framed. It appears that the grievance of respondent No. 2 is that he has been wrongfully ignored from promotion and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... can be said to be information relating to a person and not in respect of grading of a candidate. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the arguments raised by the petitioner that under Section 8(1)(j) of the Act, such information cannot be supplied. The argument that information sought is part of vindictiveness of respondent No. 2 is not tenable. The information sought is in respect of marks obta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
