2009 (10) TMI 319

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent. [Order per: M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal against the order of Commissioner No. 36/Commr./2004 dated 23-6-2004, confirming the demand of Rs. 15,56,775/- along with interest and imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- 2. Heard both sides. 3. The ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that they are not contesting the demands of Rs. 11,565/-, Rs. 2,407/- and Rs. 4,510 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ally mentioned in the invoices and product description not mentioned and only part No. mentioned. These demands are not justified for the reasons given in the order passed today on the appeals mentioned above by the same party and therefore, the demand in this regard is also set aside. 5. A sum of Rs. 5,33,416/- stands disallowed in respect of furnace oil received from M/s. HPCL, first stage deal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X