9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (12) TMI 392X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Petitioner. S/Shri R.N. Mitra, Sr. Advocate with R.N. Sinha, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The Court: In the writ petition, M/s. Dhoot Developers Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, has challenged the proposal dated 27th October, 2009 issued by the Income Tax Officer, Technical-2, Kolkata on behalf of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-II, responde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ritten submission by 29th October, 2009. By letter dated 29th October, 2009 the petitioner prayed for extension of time by fifteen days to file objection. By letter dated 30th October, 2009 time was granted till 5th November, 2009. On 5th November, 2009 the petitioner filed the objection. Matter was heard by the respondent no.1 and on 6th November, 2009 order was passed directing the transfer of j ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... viting the views of the petitioner regarding transfer of jurisdiction from Kolkata to New Delhi and a new case has been made out as seen from the order under challenge. Therefore, the impugned order of transfer cannot be sustained. 6. Mr.R.N.Mitra, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted that the order is just and proper as objections were invited, hearing was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... made out in the order under challenge which the petitioner could not meet while furnishing reply. In my view, if it is the case of the respondents that a coordinated investigation is required for meaningful assessment, the Revenue should have appraised the petitioner determinatively in the proposal, which is absent. Moreover, though detailed written reply giving particulars regarding the place of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
