Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1990 (1) TMI 192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ass fibres. A sample was tested by the Chemical Examiner, Madras, with the following results :- The sample is in the form of pinkish colour fibrous hard lumps and powder. It is composed of synthetic resin (phenolic), inorganic fillers and cellulosic fibres. It is seen from the books on the subject that phenolic moulding compounds are used in making various types of decorative, mechanical, electrical and other parts and articles. Hence the sample under reference may not be considered as an article of plastic." After issue of show cause notice and hearing the respondent, the Assistant Collector passed an order on 29-9-1984 classifying the goods under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act (the Schedule is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6-1986 in Appeal Nos. ED(SB)(T) 1318-1179/82 (the parties being Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad and Bakelite Hylam) was not challenged by the manufacturer. In the proceedings before this Tribunal Bakelite Hylam sought to raise a plea that the addition of inert fillers (glass fibre) to duty paid synthetic resin resulting in physical modification of the resin, did not amount to manufacture for the purpose of excise duty levy. The Tribunal held that since this ground had not been taken before the lower authorities - it had been given up before the lower appellate authority - Bakelite Hylam could not agitate this ground before the Tribunal. The Tribunal referred to an earlier decision that conversion of duty paid PVC resin into PVC mou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... compound in the instant case fell under Item No. 15A(1), CET. The Department s contention is that the Collector (Appeals) is wrong in holding that moulding compound manufactured out of duty paid resin would not be liable to duty again under Item No. 15A(1), CET. In support of the stand that duty would be leviable, Shri Sunder Rajan relied on this Tribunal s decision in Collector of Central Excise, Thane v. Indian Dyestuff Industries Ltd., Bombay -1986 (26) E.L.T. 936. Wherein it was held that duty would be leviable on the form in which the goods (formulated dyestuffs in that case) were cleared. 7. Shri B. Shankar, for the respondent, countered the above submissions by drawing attention to the grounds taken in the appeal for classificat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the issue therein was one of valuation and not manufacture. 11. Shri Shankar referred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court s judgment dated 4-4-1985 in Writ Petition No. 3320 of 1976 filed by the present respondent. Following the Bombay High Court s judgment in Industrial Plastic Corporation Private Ltd. case (supra) and taking note of the Government s Circular Letter F. No. 93/2/82-CX. 3 dated 6-10-1982 to all Collectors of Central Excise, the Court observed :- It is not necessary to go into the details of the matter in this case inasmuch as the matter is concluded by a judgment of Bombay High Court in Industrial Plastic Corporation Private Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Another -1983 (12) E.L.T. 425. Further, the Government of In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... se was complicated. We do not think that this makes for any difference. Whether the mixing process was simple or complicated, the fact remains that resin was mixed with inorganic fillers and cellulosic fibres and the resultant product was no longer known as resin but as dough moulding compound . The only question to be considered is whether such compound made out of duty-paid resin would attract duty again. This was precisely the question in the Indian Cable Co. case. The Tribunal had observed in that case that in the case of Industrial Plastic Corporation -1983 (12) E.L.T. 425 (supra), before the Bombay High Court, the provision which fell for interpretation was Notification No. 122/71 dated 1-6-1971. The Court construed the inclusive def .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates