The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order ...

Notice u/s 148 is not valid since not served as sent to wrong email ID. Limitation extended due to Covid-19.

May 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order where no notice u/s 148 was served on the assessee. The notice u/s 148 was issued through the ITBA portal but sent to the wrong email ID. The tribunal held that the notice generated on 30.03.2021 was not served on the assessee as the email ID did not belong to them. The limitation for issuing the notice would have ended on 30.03.2020, extended to 31.03.2021 due to Covid-19. The AO issued the notice just one day before the extended deadline, but the revenue failed to prove its service. The decision favored the assessee due to the lack of proper service of the notice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order ...

Notice u/s 148 is not valid since not served as sent to wrong email ID. Limitation extended due to Covid-19.

May 31, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - default servicing notice - notice served on the secondary email id registered with PAN - AO ought to have sent the notice u/s 148 to...

Notice u/s 148 send through registered post is presumed to be served

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148A(b) to wrong Email ID - notices are sent to (i) email ids that are no longer in use (ii) email ids of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation extended to 16 years vide Finance Act, 2012- validity of notice for the period which has been expired already...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of the order of reassessment. It held that sufficient opportunities were granted to the petitioner by...

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

Relaxation in adherence to prescribed timelines issued by SEBI due to Covid 19 - Circular

Preventive measures to be taken to contains the spread of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Trade Notice

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

Failure to service notice due to wrong email address - The assessee was not served notice due to wrong reference of email address, therefore, in our view the assessee...

Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 barred by limitation - Though the notice u/s 148(2) was first published in the newspaper on 09.12.2017 which was beyond the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Date of issuance of notice - communication in electronic form - Whether digitally signing notice would automatically amount to issuance...

Quick Updates: