1996 (12) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Shri Arulswamy, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T. P. Nambiar, Member (J)]. - This application is filed by the applicant praying that the delay in filing the appeal may be condoned. 2.   The learned Counsel submitted that the original order is a nullity as it was passed beyond the terms of the remand order passed by the Tribunal. In this regard, he pointed out that the original or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. He stated that the issue that has to be decided is as to whether this delay is satisfactorily explained by the applicant or not. 4.   We have considered the submissions. We find that admittedly the applicant received the orders on 28-5-1993 from the Supdt. vide his letter OC No. 330/93. There is absolutely no mention in the application .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... file the appeal in time for sufficient reasons. In this regard, no reasons whatsoever are furnished except to say that they were making correspondences with the authorities to change the order. Merely stating that they were corresponding with the authorities is not sufficient enough to hold that they have satisfactorily explained the delay in question. In the case cited by the learned Counsel, as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X