TMI Blog1999 (6) TMI 226X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. The Miscellaneous application seeks for correcting some typographical errors in the grounds of appeal pertaining to the name of the company. 2. After hearing both sides and verification, the Miscellaneous application is allowed. 3. This appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 369/88, dated 21-2-1989 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) denying the benefit o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ompanies namely name of the company who had supplied the technology under licence for its manufacture by the appellants and the name of the company which was marketing the goods after they were cleared from the appellants factory. He submits that the matter is no longer res integra as the Hon ble Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 2437-2438/97, dated 11-9-1997 [1998 (100) E.L.T. 490 (T)] in the case o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... longer res integra, as this issue has been decided under the citations noted supra. We find in this case a perusal of the label shows that the words Ameron U.S.A. pertained to name of the company, which has supplied the technology and has licenced the present appellants to manufacture the same in accordance with the technology. This is the name of the company i.e. house mark , and not a brand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
