Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (10) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act. Then availed Modvat credit of Rs. 17,053/- on CEL Deck cooling pad 7090, with distributor under Rule 57 Q of the Central Excise Rules on the ground, that these were being used for supplying conditioned air to the tape unit and its purpose was to control the humidity and temperature of the surroundings. The Assistant Commissioner, however disallowed the Modvat credit on these goods by holding that these were not used for producing or processing any of the goods or for bringing about any change in any substance towards the manufacture of the final product vide Order-in-Original No. 86/96, dated 29-11-1996. The appellants filed against that order, but that order of the Assistant Commissioner wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed for production, processing or bringing about any change in the substance for the manufacture of the final products, and has got no direct nexus with the production of the final products, as these are being used only for dehumidification of the air in the plant, had been rightly held to be not capital goods falling under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. In C.C.E., Coimbatore v. Shanmugaraja Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra) also it has been ruled by the Tribunal that humidification plant though helps in maintaining the certain level of humidity, does not lead to an inference that it is an equipment for the production, processing or bringing about any change in the substance and as such is not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 5 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is rarely complete. In the third case, the observations relied upon by the appellants, of the Tribunal that chilled water coil used for bringing down the temperature in coating room is covered under definition of capital goods under Rule 57 Q. But the law laid down in both these cases does not advance the plea of the appellants for treating their goods to be capital goods as the goods, in question are being used by them for dehumidification of the air in the plant which has got no nexus with the production of final product or for bringing about any change in the substance used for the production of the final product. 12. Similarly, law laid down in the other cases that Modvat credit is not confined to capital items which bring abo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates