2000 (8) TMI 432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Ravinder Narain, ld. Counsel submits that a mistake has crept in the Misc. Order No. 15/2000-C dt. 28-1-2000. He refers to the order and submits that it was admitted that the issues of limitation and methodology of calculation though discussed and brought to the notice of the original bench yet no order was passed by the original bench. He submits .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fore the Bench that point is considered. He submits that in this case the difference of opinion arose was that of classification. He submits that limitation and methodology of calculation of duty amount might have not been considered important by the author of the order. He, therefore, submits that there was no mistake apparent on the face of the records. 3. We have heard the rival submissio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be decided by the Bench and only if any difference of opinion arises on this count, not only the difference on classification but also the question of limitation and methodology of calculation on this may be required to be made to the third member. The ROM is allowed in the above terms. The case should be listed before appropriate bench of two Members.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X