Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (10) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stoms Tariff Act as claimed by them or under sub-heading 8302.41 CTA as venetian blinds confirmed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), under the impugned order. 2. Shri K. Kumar, learned Advocate, alongwith Shri N.C. Sogani, learned Consultant, submitted that the Department has classified the impugned goods under sub-heading 8302.41 relying upon the decision in the case of Interarch Building Products (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Customs - 1993 (65) E.L.T. 80 (T); that the said decision is not applicable to the facts of the present matter; that the impugned goods, imported by the Appellants, are only aluminium coils alloy in a running length of 1000 Mts for use in the manufacture of venetian blinds in their factory; that sub-heading 8302. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pe of a channel tapered at one end, having holes and fine cutting, besides being painted and contended that the goods were completely processed articles and there was no other process left to be worked on them except cutting them into required length. He also mentioned that merely because the aluminium strips in question are to be used in the manufacture of venetian blinds, these cannot be classified as venetian blinds or components for venetian blinds; that it is settled law that end use cannot be made the basis for deciding classification of a product under the Tariff. He relied upon the decision in Dunlop India Ltd. v. U.O.I., 1983 (13) E.L.T. 1566 (S.C.). He finally relied upon the Circular No. 28/89-CX 4, dated 26-9-1989 in which it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ll of Entry according to which The goods appear to be correctly classifiable under CTH 83.02 in accordance with decision of CEGAT 1993 (65) E.L.T. 80 (T). He also mentioned that the Aluminium Strips imported by them are colour coated and not meant for any other use. In reply, the learned Advocate submitted that the expression suitable for has been used in relation to Words base metal mountings, fittings and similar articles and the coils imported by them cannot be classified under Heading 83.02 by giving an unlimited interpretation to the said expression; that this cannot be applied to each and every thing; that suitability is to be judged in conjunction with the things mentioned in the heading. 4. We have considered the submissio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Notes of HSN, Heading 83.02 covers general purpose classes of base metal accessory fittings and mountings, such as are used largely on furniture, doors, windows, coach work, etc. Goods within such general classes remain in this heading even if they are designed for particular uses (e.g., door handles or hinges for automobiles). Further, the Explanatory Notes clarifies that the heading does not, however, extend to goods forming an essential part of the structure of the article, such as windows frames, or switch devices for revolving chairs. It is thus evident that Aluminium coils cannot by itself be considered as mounting, fittings and similar articles suitable for blinds. Some of the examples of articles suitable for blinds given in Ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates