2000 (10) TMI 920

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ain, C.A. with Reena Khair, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The application is for rehearing the appeal on the ground that the written order, which was dictated in Court, has not been signed. 2. The departmental representative cites the decision of the Tribunal in CCE v. Panchal Products - 1993 (68) E.L.T. 918 listing for re-hearing the matter in w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ess there is an exceptional feature. 4. On this being brought to the departmental representative's notice, he says that the exceptional feature in this case is that the departmental representative did not have time to consider a crucial piece of evidence which effects the outcome, the statement of Alistan Ross, export manager of the firm which supplied the whisky concentrate which was the su .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd was therefore brought to the notice of the department well before commencement of hearing of the Supreme Court which was in July 1999. 7. A counter was filed in the Supreme Court against the appeal of Bussa Overseas and Bharat Bussa. In drafting this counter, consent of the Mumbai Custom House officers who were concerned in the matter would have been obtained. The departmental representat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X