HC held that a Commissioner's mere decision to appeal does not ...

Challenging Tax Refund Appeals: Commissioner's Appeal Does Not Automatically Suspend Refund Order Under Section 54(11)

May 6, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC held that a Commissioner's mere decision to appeal does not automatically suspend a refund order under Section 54(11). The plain statutory language indicates that the pendency of an appeal does not ipso facto place the principal order in abeyance. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court mandated that the revenue authority must comply with the appellate order and release the refund amount with applicable statutory interest. The writ petition was consequently allowed, directing immediate refund to the petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that a Commissioner's mere decision to appeal does not ...

Challenging Tax Refund Appeals: Commissioner's Appeal Does Not Automatically Suspend Refund Order Under Section 54(11)

May 6, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC affirmed tax authority's adjustment of AY 2010-11 refund against pre-existing tax liabilities of corporate debtor. Resolution applicant's claim to refund rejected on...

Denial of interest on the refund claim sanctioned to the appellant - it is seen that in ordinary course of refund arising out of finalization of provisional assessment...

HC upheld the refund claim, ruling that the tax department cannot withhold the refund based solely on Section 54(11) opinion when no appeal challenges the Appellate...

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's petition challenging the order of the Single Judge. The court held that u/s 18(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and...

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

Refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - Period of limitation - Tax paid on self assessment basis - Claim of refund without challenging the assessment, to claim the...

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Delay in issuing Refund under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 - interest on delayed refund - Despite the issuance of Form No. 5, the refunds for the Assessment...

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

Violation of Regulations 11(a), 11(d) and 11(n) of CBLR, 2013 - the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA as laid down in Regulation 11 of CBLR 2013. -...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

100% EOU - Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - The refund claim of the appellant is not a claim u/s 11 B per se and therefore provisions of 11 B cannot be blindly...

Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price...

Entitlement to interest on IGST refund - In refund application petitioner has only claimed the integrated tax and not the interest on the same - The High court referred...

Quick Updates: