2002 (11) TMI 683

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... NT 1. This writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 15-2-2002 passed in Paul D'Souza v. Canara Bank 2002 (2) Kar. L.J. 451, wherein this Court while allowing the writ petition has set aside the Office Order No. 12, dated 2-12-1996 and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the interlocutory applications in accordance with law. 2. The learn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ounsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection for remanding the matter. But so far as legal representatives' application and interlocutory applications are concerned the same can be considered by the Tribunal as per the directions given by the learned Single Judge in Paul D'Souza's case (supra). 4. We have heard the learned Counsels for the parties, perused the materials on record a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t be a precedent, to which the learned Counsels for respondents-petitioners has no objection as stated. 6. On consideration and as agreed, the legal representatives' application can be considered as per the direction of the learned Single Judge before the Tribunal without making it a precedent. It is also made clear that the decision of the learned Single Judge will not be a precedent and the Deb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X