TMI Blog2001 (11) TMI 972X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Mondal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. The present Miscellaneous Applications have been filed by the appellants for staying the operation of Final Order No. A-1852-1858/98, dated 13-11-2000 [2001 (131) E.L.T. 222 (Tri.)] vide which the appeal filed by the appellants was rejected and for continuation of Stay Order No ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reme Court s decision in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. Bansidhar Sons reported in 1986 (24) E.L.T. 193 (S.C.). Reliance has also been placed upon the Tribunal s decision in the case of Roxy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise reported in 1992 (60) E.L.T. 477 (Tribunal) wherein the stay order was extended during the disposal of the Reference Application by the Hon ble ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellants have already deposited an amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- and the reference application filed before the Hon ble High Court has been allowed, we extend the stay order dated 21-9-99 passed by this Tribunal and direct that the same will continue to be in force till the final disposal of the reference application by the Hon ble High Court of Kolkata. Miscellaneous Applications are disposed of in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
