2003 (11) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - The respondent is a manufacturer of textile machinery parts namely, 'Electrical Yarn Heating & Stabilising Devices' and 'Vapour Phase Yarn Heating & Stabilising Evies'. On 16-2-94, Central Excise officers visited his factory and made out a case that the respondent had violated Central Excise Rules by not entering their production from 2-2-94 to 16 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssembled. Commissioner (Appeals) also noted that the respondent's claim that the goods had not been fully manufactured was supported by expert opinion. Commissioner relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Kamal Plywood & Allied Inds. P. Ltd. v. C.C.E., Meerut - 1996 (82) E.L.T. 323 (T), wherein the Tribunal held that non-accountal is merely a technical breach and goods were not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X