2003 (10) TMI 522

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In this appeal, the Revenue has questioned the validity of the impugned order-in-original vide which the Commissioner had allowed the abatement of duty claim of the respondents for the period 27-5-1998 to 13-10-1998. 2. None has come present on behalf of the respondents in spite of service of notice for today i.e. 6-10-2003. No request for adjournment has been also received from them. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -10-1998. Due intimation was also given by the respondents to the Department regarding the restart of the unit. 4. The argument of the learned JDR for the appellants that the reading of the electricity meter was not furnished by the respondents on the date of closure of their factory as well as on the date of re-start of the factory, and as such they could not be said to have fulfilled the r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X