2004 (2) TMI 589

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . The appellants have been denied Modvat credit in respect of the impugned goods on the ground that the credit was not taken within 6 months as required under Rule 57G. Shri D.B. Shroff, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the impugned goods are inputs which were sent to the job workers (directly in some cases) during April/May, 1995 and the intermediate goods, after processi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y on inputs used in the manufacture of intermediate goods and therefore, for the earlier period, in the absence of a time limit fixed under Rule 57J, the period within which the appellants received the intermediate goods being slightly over six months may be considered to be a reasonable period. 2. Heard Shri S.S. Bhagat, learned SDR, for the Department, who contends that the appellants had not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X