2005 (7) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... als, which have been preferred against the common Order-in-Appeal, the appellants have contested the confiscation of their silk fabric and imposition of penalties on them under Sec. 112 of the Customs Act. 2. I have heard both the sides and gone through the records. 3. The silk fabric, in question, was seized from the premises of the printer, to whom it was supplied for printing by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te confiscation of the goods, requires modification and the same is accordingly modified. The appellant, Shri Amit Barman is allowed to redeem the goods on payment of redemption fine of rupees 10,000/- while the other two on payment of redemption of rupees 50,000/- each. 4. The personal penalties of 10,000/- imposed on each appellant by the Commissioner (Appeals), do not require any interfer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X