2007 (6) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. The appellants initially declared the diameter of the rolling mill as 170 mm. which was on verification found to be 165 mm. and accordingly, the Annual Capacity of Production was fixed. However, to meet the revised criterion for less duty-liability, the appellants sought permission from the Commissioner to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e lower Appellate Authority has also passed the impugned Order confirming the demand, feeling helpless, since the jurisdictional Commissioner has not approved the change in the diameter. In this connection, Shri C.R. Das, learned Advocate for the appellants places reliance on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Ankleshwar Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X