TMI Blog2007 (8) TMI 578X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ides. (b) The silica oxide is manufactured from raw silica sand and in the process of manufacturing silica oxides, they used various chemicals. The chemicals used in relation to manufacture of silica oxides is also used in relation to manufacture other dutiable products. They do not maintain separate accounts in respect of inputs which have gone into manufacture of exempted silica oxides. (c) During investigation, they paid a sum of Rs. 26,86,397/- representing the amount payable under Rule 57CC. (d) The show cause notice was issued demanding under Rule 57CC an amount of Rs. 26,86,397/- @ 8% of the value of silica oxides cleared at Nil rate of duty. (e) Commissioner, taking note of the fact that the respondent reverse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1) E.L.T. 1043 (Tri-Kolkata), wherein it has been held that the obligation to follow the Rule 57CC(1) or 57CC(9) is completely independent of the existence or non-existence of the supplementary recovery and penal provision for floating Rule 57CC. 5. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent relies on the Circular of the Board No. 591/28/2001-CX, dt. 16-10-2001, wherein it has been clarified where the assessee has not paid the amount (under Rule 57CC), the availment of corresponding credit of input is incorrect. The recovery of the said credit taken incorrectly is squarely covered by the provisions of Rule 12 (erstwhile Rule 57-I). The advocate also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in case of SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant v. CCE, Ja ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 57CC(1) provides an option to the assessee to pay amount calculated @ 8% of the price of exempted product. This option cannot be thrust upon any assessee. If they have not opted for and fulfilled the provisions of 57CC(1), the department would be free to proceed to recover the input duty credit used in the manufacture of exempted product and other action as provided for. 7.2 In this case, the respondent, though paid a sum of Rs. 27,64,978/- during the course of investigation, the very fact that the show cause notice was issued for confirmation of amount in terms of Rule 57CC, should lead to conclusion that the amount paid by them should be treated only as a deposit. Inasmuch as the assessee has shown reluctance to opt for Rule 57CC(1), th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
