Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was ...

Court Dismisses Claim of Natural Justice Violation Due to NIL Return Filing; Advises Appellate Remedies.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was not been given to the petitioner - The Court rejects the petitioner's contention regarding non-compliance with Section 46. Since the petitioner filed a NIL return, no notice was necessary under this section. The case falls under Chapter XIV, where notices were issued under Section 70 post-search and seizure. - The Court finds no violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was provided with opportunities for a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(5) of the Act. The petitioner's admission of GST liability in evidence strengthens this finding. - Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner directed to pursue appellate remedies.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was ...

Court Dismisses Claim of Natural Justice Violation Due to NIL Return Filing; Advises Appellate Remedies.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show...

The High Court rejected the condonation of delay in filing income tax returns, as the returns were handled by a Chartered Accountant who could not take timely steps due...

Cancellation of GST registration without providing opportunity to be heard violated principles of natural justice. Appeal filed by petitioner rejected due to expiry of...

The case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court involved a challenge to the cancellation of GST registration due to delay in filing a writ petition and alleged violation...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - non filling of return on time - the ITAT held that the return filed beyond the due date cannot claim deduction under section 80IB(10) as per...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

The case involved denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of return. The department argued return must be filed u/s 139(1) to claim exemption u/s 11. An amendment...

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

The court dismissed the petition, holding that there was no violation of principles of natural justice due to alleged vagueness in the show cause notice (SCN). The SCN...

Reassessment proceedings were ex-parte, violating principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to file reply documents due to...

Petition maintainable despite previously filed appeal. Order passed in violation of principles of natural justice by not allowing petitioner to file reply within...

Quick Updates: