2008 (6) TMI 484

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellant. Shri C. Seethapathy, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. This appeal of the Revenue is for recovery of an amount of Rs. 24,717/- being 8% of the sale price (excluding tax) of the respondents final products cleared, without payment of duty, to M/s. SHARE Centre (SC) and M/s. Bhaba Atomic Research Centre (BARC) during October to December 97 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... also, who has reiterated the cross-objections filed by the party. 2. After considering the submissions, we have found valid reason to sustain the impugned order. Though, in their cross-objections, the party has pleaded that none of the inputs specified in the SCN and the Order-in-Original can be considered to be a common input for purposes of Rule 57CC, we think, it is not necessary to address t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X