Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Tribunal found no ...

Income Tax

April 27, 2024

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Tribunal found no justification for imposing a penalty as the assessee had sufficient cash balances and transparently recorded the land purchase in the books, supported by audit reports. Emphasized that agreeing to additions in quantum proceedings does not automatically warrant a penalty. - Regarding the issue related to Contractual Receipts Discrepancy: Considering the meager amount of discrepancy compared to the total income, lack of mala fide intention, and explanation regarding accounting practices, the Tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified. Overall, the Tribunal concluded that neither issue warranted the imposition of penalties, thereby ruling in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Tribunal found no ...

Income Tax

April 27, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of incorrect deduction u/s 80GGA - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the timeline of events and noted that the assessee had...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty imposed u/s 271(1) - Power of reduce or waive penalty u/s 273A - concealment of income - Tribunal was wrong in cancelling the penalty imposed on the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - From the order of ITAT, there is a clear finding that the assessee is liable to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Hence, if the...

Levying the penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Just for making wrong claims made advertently or inadvertently, therefore, penalty cannot be levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Quick Updates: