2008 (6) TMI 519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The stay application and the appeal are taken up together for the disposal as per law. The appellants had filed appeal along with COD application for condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) did not condone the delay. The appellant's contention is that the concerned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... E.L.T. 449 (T)] (iv)   Traco Cable Co. Ltd. v. CCE [2000 (126) E.L.T. 643 (T)] affirmed by the  Apex Court [2001 (127) E.L.T. A49] (v)     Bayer Diagnostics India Ltd. v. CCE [2001 (133) E.L.T. 140 (T) (vi)   CCE v. Surya Roshini Ltd. [2002 (140) E.L.T. 216 (T)] (vii)  Aksh India Ltd. v. CE [2002 (140) E.L.T. 220 (T)] (viii) J.K. Industries Lt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hennai v. Mittal Ispat Ltd. [2002 (141) E.L.T. 117 (Tri. -Chennai)] (iv)   CC, Chennai v. Goverdhan Creation [2002 (148) E.L.T. 236 (Tri. - Chennai)] (v)     CCE v. Lucas TVS Ltd. [1986 (24) E.L.T. 365 (Tribunal)] 3. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides, we find that the appellants have given sufficient reason for condonation of del .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X