2010 (10) TMI 924

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dvocate Mr. Vedamurthy. 2. According to the appellant Counsel, the appellant being the State Government undertaking, admitted the VAT amount paid by the appellant and disputed amount pertains to the transactions on which Service Tax was leviable. Therefore, there need not be any direction to deposit 50% of the VAT amount demanded by the Departments, pending disposal of Writ Petitions. 3. Accor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case of Apex Court, their Lordships have observed that Supreme Court did not interfere in the interim order particularly with the matters concerned with the levy of Tax. Peculiar circumstances prevailed so as to grant relaxations as the assessees was a public Sector Company handling kerosene distribution system and the demand was for 1.34 crores. Therefore granting conditional order of stay to de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X