HC allowed the writ petition in part, finding that the notice ...

Statutory Notice Defect Invalidates Tax Proceedings, Mandates Corrective Action Within 3 Months Under CGST Section 73

May 2, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the writ petition in part, finding that the notice issued under Section 73 of CGST Act, 2017 did not comply with statutory requirements for providing thirty days' response time. The court set aside the impugned actions dated 30.11.2023 and remanded the matter to the authority to issue a corrigendum to the 29.09.2023 notice, extending the reply and hearing timelines in strict accordance with Section 73(8). The authority must complete this exercise within three months from the order date, with remaining contentions left open for future adjudication.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the writ petition in part, finding that the notice ...

Statutory Notice Defect Invalidates Tax Proceedings, Mandates Corrective Action Within 3 Months Under CGST Section 73

May 2, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-issue of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - The Appellate Tribunal found that the AO had not issued the statutory notice under...

HC invalidated show cause notices (SCN) issued by DRI authorities u/s 28 of Customs Act 1962, following precedent set in Canon India case where SC ruled such notices...

HC set aside GST assessment proceedings due to absence of Document Identification Number (DIN). Following established precedents and CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST...

Jurisdiction to enhance the dues – The corrective action attempted by Commissioner (Appeals) in appeal cannot rectify the defect of the show cause notice. - AT

Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

HC held that under Sections 292B and 292BB of the Income Tax Act, the assessee cannot challenge the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) or assessment order u/s 143(3) after...

HC set aside GST assessment order due to absence of assessing officer's signature, holding it as a fatal procedural defect. The court determined that signature...

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was...

HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against a dissolved company, finding them without jurisdiction and contrary to law. The proceedings violated statutory...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - a proper satisfaction has been arrived at before initiation of penalty proceedings, and then a defect in notice including mere...

Incorrect Data in certain IECs - corrective action required from exporters

HC held that Section 93 addresses tax liability post-death but does not authorize determination against a deceased person. Issuance of show cause notice (SCN) and demand...

Quick Updates: